|
|
|
keith williams restoring a hard drive after hacker attack
|
|
|
: Most of those Hacker types that I knew, knew a lot about computers, : even to the point of working right down to assembly or machine code : level. Today those talents are not all that much in demand, and the : wares we now have reflect it. Features and glitz hiding slow, error prone, : inefficient generic code. Outlook which many of use here is a prime : example, as it loses bits of memory, occasionally crashes, etc...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
keith williams restoring a hard drive after hacker attack
|
|
|
A valid explanination why windoze 2000 is soooo slooow. If Microshaft would have written it in solid intel assembly language (no C or C ++), then a 80386 SX processor should be able to handle it with ease. Not really, as all major operating systems are written this way. It would also make it virtually impossible to port to another processor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
keith williams restoring a hard drive after hacker attack
|
|
|
or C ++), then a 80386 SX processor should be able to handle it with ease. Not really, as all major operating systems are written this way. It would also make it virtually impossible to port to another processor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
keith williams restoring a hard drive after hacker attack
|
|
|
Besides that, if they tried to write it in assembler they'd have to call it Windows _3_000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
keith williams restoring a hard drive after hacker attack
|
|
|
On top of that, do you have any idea how many errors will creep (creep? try thunder!) into anything that was written in assembler! it's bad enough having people write in C or C++. Keith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
keith williams restoring a hard drive after hacker attack
|
|
|
STD DIALUP <
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
wrote in message A valid explanination why windoze 2000 is soooo slooow. If Microshaft would have written it in solid intel assembly language (no C or C ++), then a 80386 SX processor should be able to handle it with ease. Not really, as all major operating systems are written this way. It would also make it virtually impossible to port to another processor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|